A Shooting Theory that won’t Bohr You

by Hap Rocketto

Niels Bohr, 1935

In another life I was a high school science teacher and my favorite subject was physics. I was pretty good at teaching mechanics and heat but less successful at explaining things in the less easily observable world of light, sound, and atomic theory. In an attempt to do this I often tried, occasionally succeeding, to relate things to the observable world.

As background it is important to know that through the years the concept of how an atom is constructed has changed. The Greek philosopher Democritus initially surmised that things could not be divided ad infinitum because if they did then everything would be made up of the same substance, there had to be a small part that distinguished one type of matter from another. J.J. Thompson proved this when he discovered the electron, a smaller part of the atom, a few millennia after Democtitus first made his suggestion. On the heels of Thompson’s research Ernest Rutherford theorized that electrons were uniformly distributed in the atom.

The Danish physicist Niels Bohr, a student of both Thompson and Rutherford, theorized in 1925 that electrons circled the nucleus of the atom in much the same way that planets orbit the Sun, although the electrons are in different planes. The work was so important that, to this day, a sketch of the orbital model is used as the universal symbol of atomic energy. Bohr’s work, which won him the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1922, was instrumental to the development of the current atomic theory of quantum mechanics.

George Gamow, a Russian-born American physicist whose theory titled “Space – the Big Ball of Fire” has come to be popularly known as the “Big Bang Theory” was a colleague of Bohr’s and relates this anecdote about the depth of the mind of the Danish Nobel laureate.

“The evening work in the Institute’s library was often interrupted by Bohr, who would say that he was very tired and would like to go to the movies. The only movies he liked were wild Westerns, and he always needed a couple of his students to go with him and explain the complicated plots involving hostile Indians, brave cowboys, and desperados, sheriffs, bar maidens, gold-diggers, and other characters of the Old West.

His theoretical mind showed even in these movie expeditions. He developed a theory to explain why although the villain always draws first, the hero is faster and manages to kill him. This Bohr theory was based on psychology. Since the hero never shoots first, the villain has to decide when to draw, which impedes his action. The hero, on the other hand, acts according to a conditioned reflex and grabs the gun automatically as soon as he sees the villain’s hand move. We disagreed with this theory, and the next day I went to a toy store and bought two guns in Western holders. We shot it out with Bohr, he playing the hero, and he ‘killed’ all his students.”

If I let my imagination run free I can see the standoff. The middle aged physicist facing his post doctoral research assistant, Mattel six guns slung low, white lab coats reminding me of linen cattle dusters, two men facing each other in an imagined western main street made up of lab tables cluttered with retorts, oscilloscopes, and ring stands. The old man’s hand hovers above the white plastic grip of the six-shooter while his eyes stare unblinking at the twitching hand of the junior scientist.

Much like the terrified town folks in any Saturday matinee movie oat burner of the 40s or 50s the rest of the lab staff looks on, peering behind the perceived safety of raised clipboards, index fingers poised over stopwatch buttons, and pens raised to record data. In a flash the post-doc moves, the old man responds, lab assistant index fingers spasm twice-starting and stopping the timepieces, and pens scratch numbers on graph paper. Good science requires that the experiment be repeated until an adequate data base is built. After numerous replications the staff retires to lab stools, studies the data, and concludes, based on empirical data, that a second Bohr’s Model is ready for release to scholarly journals.

What Bohr addresses, for the interest of the shooter, is the simple fact that much of the success of shooting is developing a conditioned reflex. Once you have the mechanics down and have fired enough good shots to condition your trigger finger to move when the sight picture is that of an X then you will find that good shots just seem to happen.

About Hap Rocketto

Hap Rocketto is a Distinguished Rifleman with service and smallbore rifle, member of The Presidents Hundred, and the National Guard’s Chief’s 50. He is a National Smallbore Record holder, a member of the 1600 Club and the Connecticut Shooters’ Hall Of Fame. He was the 2002 Intermediate Senior Three Position National Smallbore Rifle Champion, the 2012 Senior Three Position National Smallbore Rifle Champion a member of the 2007 and 2012 National Four Position Indoor Championship team, coach and captain of the US Drew Cup Team, and adjutant of the United States 2009 Roberts and 2013 Pershing Teams. Rocketto is very active in coaching juniors. He is, along with his brother Steve, a cofounder of the Corporal Digby Hand Schützenverein. A historian of the shooting sports, his work appears in Shooting Sports USA, the late Precision Shooting Magazine, The Outdoor Message, the American Rifleman, the Civilian Marksmanship Program’s website, and most recently, the apogee of his literary career, pronematch.com.
This entry was posted in Hap's Corner and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A Shooting Theory that won’t Bohr You

  1. Cristina says:

    Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just
    sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
    Do you have any recommendations for first-time blog writers?
    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

    Here is my web blog – jual cardigan wanita (Cristina)

  2. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting
    my own weblog and was wondering what all is needed to get
    setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a
    pretty penny? I’m not very internet smart so I’m
    not 100% sure. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Here is my web site :: cari pakaian murah

  3. If you want to take much from this article then you have to apply these techniques to your won blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *